ArcGIS REST Services Directory
JSON

Layer: Vegetation _ Lower Feather River Update _ 2018 _ ds2891 (ID:0)

View In:   Map Viewer

Name: Vegetation _ Lower Feather River Update _ 2018 _ ds2891

Display Field: MCVName

Type: Feature Layer

Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon

Description:

The Feather River was mapped using 2018 National Agricultural Inventory Program (NAIP) imagery, and using a classification developed by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) based in the National Vegetation Classification System (NVCS). A report describing mapping methodology for a similar project can be found here: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=184992. For more information about California's classification, see https://vegetation.cnps.org/.Changes in a remap effort can occur due to several factors, some due to physical change and some due to non-physical change. Examples of factors that represent physical change are: stand maturation or decadence, fire, erosion, deposition, anthropogenic disturbances such as scraping/clearing, urban development, agricultural development, and restoration. Non-physical changes include: improvement in imagery quality, incorrect original mapping, imagery shifts, improvement of older linework, and change in level mapped (classification). Imagery quality continues to improve with time, which allows the photointerpreter to better determine which species are present and in what amounts to determine its best classification. A photointerpreter could also disagree with the previous mapper’s decisions and may change the classification in the remapping effort. A more subtle map change, which does not affect the acreages significantly, is when the photointerpreter improves old linework to make it better fit the classification type visually. Also, when the NAIP imagery is ortho-rectified, in some years it does not perfectly align with the year it is being compared to and linework needs to be shifted/redrawn. Lastly, a photointerpreter may have remapped an Alliance at the Group level due to lack of confidence at the Alliance level, and vice versa the interpreter may have mapped an Alliance that was previously mapped at Group level due to better confidence at that level. All of these factors should be taken into consideration when using and comparing these data to previous efforts.



Copyright Text: Chico State Research Foundation - Geographical Information Center, for the Department of Water Resources and California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Vegetation Mapping Program

Min. Scale: 0

Max. Scale: 0

Default Visibility: true

Max Record Count: 2000

Supported query Formats: JSON, geoJSON, PBF

Use Standardized Queries: True

Extent:

Drawing Info:

HasZ: false

HasM: false

Has Attachments: false

Has Geometry Properties: true

HTML Popup Type: esriServerHTMLPopupTypeAsHTMLText

Object ID Field: OBJECTID

Unique ID Field:

Global ID Field:

Type ID Field: MapClass

Fields:
Types:

Is Data Versioned: false

Has Contingent Values: false

Supports Rollback On Failure Parameter: true

Last Edit Date: 10/4/2024 8:44:51 PM

Schema Last Edit Date: 10/4/2024 8:44:51 PM

Data Last Edit Date: 10/4/2024 8:10:52 PM

Supported Operations:   Query   Query Top Features   Query Analytic   Query Bins   Generate Renderer   Validate SQL   Get Estimates   ConvertFormat