U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 20040303 Fort Worth, Texas U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service pa055 withheld County Soils vector digital data This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely sensed and other information. This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory of soils and nonsoil areas that normally occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the National Soil Information System relational database, which gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties. SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Digital versions of hydrography, cultural features, and other associated layers that are not part of the SSURGO data set may be available from the primary organization listed in the Point of Contact. en 20000829 20030911 publication date Complete As needed -78.101777 -77.452417 40.289912 39.719698 234394.052998 290469.518832 4399563.941555 4463339.537758 None soil survey soils Soil Survey Geographic SSURGO Counties and County Equivalents of the States of the United States and the District of Columbia (FIPS Pub 6-3) Pennsylvania Counties and County Equivalents of the States of the United States and the District of Columbia (FIPS Pub 6-3) Franklin County USGS Topographic Map Names Data Base Big Cove Tannery Quadrangle Blairs Mills Quadrangle Blue Ridge Summit Quadrangle Burnt Cabins Quadrangle Caledonia Park Quadrangle Chambersburg Quadrangle Cherry Run Quadrangle Clear Spring Quadrangle Doylesburg Quadrangle Fannettsburg Quadrangle Greencastle Quadrangle Hagerstown Quadrangle Iron Springs Quadrangle Mason and Dixon Quadrangle McConnellsburg Quadrangle Mercersburg Quadrangle Newburg Quadrangle Roxbury Quadrangle Scotland Quadrangle Shade Gap Quadrangle Shippensburg Quadrangle Smithsburg Quadrangle Saint Thomas Quadrangle Walnut Bottom Quadrangle Waynesboro Quadrangle Williamson Quadrangle None The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, should be acknowledged as the data source in products derived from these data. This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference source. This is public information and may be interpreted by organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs. Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only. Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist mailing address

USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service

Pennsylvania State Office

One Credit Union Place, Suite 340

Harrisburg PA 17110-2993 717-237-2207 ed.white@pa.usda.gov U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975 atlas This soil survey contains information that can be applied in managing farms and wetlands; in selecting sites for roads, ponds, buildings, and other structures; and in judging the suitability of tracts of land for farming, industry, and recreation. This soil survey depicts information about the kinds and distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535 Shapefile Attribute accuracy is tested by manual comparison of the source with hard copy plots and/or symbolized display of the map data on an interactive computer graphic system. Selected attributes that cannot be visually verified on plots or on screen are interactively queried and verified on screen. In addition, the attributes are tested against a master set of valid attributes. All attribute data conform to the attribute codes in the signed classification and correlation document and amendment(s). Certain node/geometry and topology GT- polygon/chain relationships are collected or generated to satisfy topological requirements (the GT-polygon corresponds to the soil delineation). Some of these requirements include: chains must begin and end at nodes, chains must connect to each other at nodes, chains do not extend through nodes, left and right GT-polygons are defined for each chain element and are consistent throughout, and the chains representing the limits of the file are free of gaps. The tests of logical consistency are performed using vendor software. All internal polygons are tested for closure with vendor software and are checked on hard copy plots. All data are checked for common soil lines (i.e., adjacent polygons with the same label). Edge locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch. The Soil Survey of Franklin County, Pennsylvania is edgematched to the adjacent SSURGO certified Pennsylvania Soil Surveys of Adams County and Fulton County and the adjacent SSURGO certified Maryland Soil Surveys of Frederick County, and Washington County. Most feature edges and feature labels in the Franklin County Soil Survey match the feature edges and feature labels in the adjacent certified Pennsylvania soil surveys. The soil survey area boundaries match. A map unit is a collection of areas defined and named the same in terms of their soil and/or nonsoil areas. Each map unit differs in some respect from all others in a survey area and is uniquely identified. Each individual area is a delineation. Each map unit consists of one or more components. Soil scientists identify small areas of soils or miscellaneous (nonsoil) areas that have properties and behavior significantly different than the named soils in the surrounding map unit. These minor components may be indicated as special features. If they have a minimal effect on use and management, or could not be precisely located, they may not be indicated on the map. Specific National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures were used in the classification of soils, design and name of map units, and location of special soil features. These standards are outlined in Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS; Agricultural Handbook 436, Soil Taxonomy, Soil Survey Staff, 1975, USDA, SCS; and all Amendments; Keys to Soil Taxonomy, Soil Survey Staff, (current issue); National Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI,(current issue). The actual composition and interpretive purity of the map unit delineations were based on data collected by scientists during the course of preparing the soil maps. Adherence to National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures is based on peer review, quality control, and quality assurance. Quality control is outlined in the memorandum of understanding for the soil survey area and in documents that reside with the Natural Resources Conservation Service state soil scientist. Four kinds of map units are used in soil surveys: consociations, complexes, associations, and undifferentiated groups. Consociations - Consociations are named for the dominant soil. In a consociation, delineated areas are dominated by a single soil taxon and similar soils. At least one half of the pedons in each delineation are of the same soil component so similar to the named soil that major interpretations are not affected significantly. The total amount of dissimilar inclusions of other components in a map unit generally does not exceed about 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if nonlimiting. A single component of a dissimilar limiting inclusion generally does not exceed 10 percent if very contrasting. Complexes and associations - Complexes and associations are named for two or more dissimilar components with the dominant component listed first. They occur in a regularly repeating pattern. The major components of a complex cannot be mapped separately at a scale of about 1:24,000. The major components of an association can be separated at a scale of about 1:24,000. In each delineation of either a complex or an association, each major component is normally present, though their proportions may vary appreciably from one delineation to another. The total amount of inclusions in a map unit that are dissimilar to any of the major components does not exceed 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if nonlimiting. A single kind of dissimilar limiting inclusion usually does not exceed 10 percent. Undifferentiated groups - Undifferentiated groups consist of two or more components that do not always occur together in the same delineation, but are included in the same named map unit because use and management are the same or similar for common uses. Every delineation has at least one of the major components and some may have all of them. The same principles regarding proportion of inclusions apply to undifferentiated groups as to consociations. Minimum documentation consists of three complete soil profile descriptions that are collected for each soil added to the legend, one additional per 3,000 acres mapped; three 10 observation transects for each map unit, one additional 10 point transect per 3,000 acres. A defined standard or level of confidence in the interpretive purity of the map unit delineations is attained by adjusting the kind and intensity of field investigations. Field investigations and data collection are carried out in sufficient detail to name map units and to identify accurately and consistently areas of about 5 acres. The accuracy of these digital data is based upon their compilation to base maps that meet National Map Accuracy Standards. The difference in positional accuracy between the soil boundaries and special soil features locations in the field and their digitized map locations is unknown. The locational accuracy of soil delineations on the ground varies with the transition between map units. For example, on long gently sloping landscapes the transition occurs gradually over many feet. Where landscapes change abruptly from steep to level, the transition will be very narrow. Soil delineation boundaries and special soil features generally were digitized within 0.01 inch of their locations on the digitizing source. The digital map elements are edge matched between data sets. The data along each quadrangle edge are matched against the data for the adjacent quadrangle. Edge locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1975 atlas Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office 15840 paper 1975 publication date SCS1 basic reference about soils and landscapes U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1988 remote sensing image Fort Worth, Texas U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 24000 paper 1988 publication date SCS2 field mapping materials U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 1988 remote sensing image Fort Worth, Texas U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service 24000 stable-base material 1988 publication date SCS3 base maps for compilation U.S. Geological Survey 1973 - 1998 map Reston, Virginia U.S. Geological Survey 24000 paper 1973 1998 publication date USGS1 landscape shape, aspect, and slope reference U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service unpublished material map 24000 stable-base material 1995 1998 date of compilation NRCS1 scanning source U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service unpublished material map 24000 paper 1989 1998 date of field mapping NRCS2 information for soil map unit delineations, special feature locations, data on soil properties U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2000 tabular digital data Fort Worth, Texas U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service online 2000 edit date in the ssarea table NRCS3 tabular soil property data linked to spatial soil data U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2000 vector digital data Fort Worth, Texas U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center 24000 online 2000 date of publication NRCS4 source for digital revision U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2003 tabular digital data Fort Collins, Colorado U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Information Technology Center online 2003 export certification date NRCS5 tabular soil property data linked to spatial soil data U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2003 vector digital data Fort Worth, Texas U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center 24000 online 2003 date of publication NRCS6 source for digital revision U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2003 unknown Fort Collins, Colorado U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 24000 database 2003 publication date NASIS attribute (tabular) information Franklin County, Pennsylvania had a previously published soil survey, 1975, at 1:15840 scale. A detailed evaluation found that significant changes in land use, soil classification, soil interpretations, and standards and procedures for making soil surveys made the 1975 survey obsolete. The approval for the soil survey update was given in 1986. The source materials needed for the field mapping were then ordered. withheld 1987 Field procedures for the second order soil survey included plotting of soil boundaries determined by field observation in conjunction with aerial photo interpretation. Boundaries were verified at closely spaced intervals, and the soils in each delineation were identified by traversing and transecting the landscape. The field work provided soil scientists with clues to patterns of soil occurrence that could be remotely determined by using aerial photography and topographic quadrangles showing landform contours. Soil scientists described and analyzed the data. The Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Franklin County, Pennsylvania was prepared by the Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) Office in Morgantown, West Virginia. withheld 1999 The soils and special soil features were compiled and digitized by the soil scientists and cartographic technicians at the Pennsylvania Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Map Compilation and Digitizing Center at University Park, Pennsylvania. The one-third of a quadrangle field maps were manually compiled to the full 7.5 minute quadrangle orthophotographs at a scale of 1:24000 and scanned at Midwest Graphics using a drum scanner at 300 dpi. The raster files of the scanned soil lines were imported into the LTPlus software for raster editing, map neatline development, labeling, edgematching, and vector conversion. The vector files were then imported into the ARC/INFO Version 7.0.4 software for final plotting, edit checks, and error analysis. Statistics on map unit acreages was generated and checked with the correlation legend and tabular data. The special features were manually digitized in ARC/INFO Version 7.0.4, and compared to the soils data. The data were created and maintained in the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). A 10 percent check plot review of the soils and special features was done by the Major Land Resource (MLRA) Office in Morgantown, West Virginia. After the staff at the Map Compilation and Digitizing Center completed their quality assurance and review, the SSURGO data were written to Digital Line Graph (DLG) 3 Optional format from ARC/INFO Version 7.0.4 with the ARCDLG command. The digital soils data were sent to the NRCS Michigan Digitizing Unit (MIDU) for review and certification. withheld 2000 The soils and special soil features were imported into ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1. The MIDU staff checked the data with a set of ARC Macro Language (AML) programs developed by the NRCS National Cartography and Geospatial Center (NCGC) in Fort Worth, Texas. The data were projected into two UTM zones and the data were edited. New DLG files reflecting these changes were written with ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1 to meet SSURGO standards. The Map Unit Interpretations Record (MUIR) data base was developed by Natural Resources Conservation Service soil scientists according to national standards. Pennsylvania NRCS soil scientists supplied the SSURGO download from the MUIR database. Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the DLG files and the SSURGO download from the MUIR database were processed with the ARC/INFO Distribution AML programs. The certified data were electronically transferred to NCGC for archival and distribution. withheld 2000 The spatial data for Franklin County, Pennsylvania has been revised by the soil scientists and cartographic technicians at the Pennsylvania NRCS Map Compilation and Digitizing Center at University Park, Pennsylvania. Water boundaries were adjusted to the digital orthophotographs and soil boundaries were adjusted to the imagery for digital map finishing. The data were written to DLG 3 Optional format from ARC/INFO Version 8.0 with the ARCDLG command. The digital soils data were sent to the MIDU for review and re-certification. withheld 2002 The MUIR attribute data have been replaced with attribute data from the National Soil Information System (NASIS) database. The NASIS database was developed by the NRCS soil scientists according to national standards. withheld 2002 The MIDU staff imported the DLG-3 Optional format files for the soils and the special features using the ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1 software. The quadrangle coverages were processed using the Revised October 1998 SSURGO Evaluation AML programs. These ARC/INFO programs identified areas within the coverages that needed revision. The data were edited. The Pennsylvania NRCS soil scientists supplied the SSURGO downloads from NASIS. The minor codes in the soils coverages were renamed to link the map units in the spatial data to the NASIS database. New DLG files were written from the updated coverages according to SSURGO standards. Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the DLG files and the SSURGO download were processed with the July 2002 Distribution AML programs provided by NCGC. The re-certified data were electronically transferred to NCGC for archival and distribution. withheld 2003 The spatial data for Franklin County, Pennsylvania has been revised by the soil scientists and cartographic technicians at the Pennsylvania NRCS Map Compilation and Digitizing Center at University Park, Pennsylvania. Soil boundaries were adjusted to better match the digital orthophotographs. The special features (point and linear) were not changed. The seamless soil survey coverage was sent to the MIDU for re-certification. The MIDU staff downloaded the tab.zip and out.zip files for Franklin County from the National SSURGO Database. The seamless coverages for the special features and the NASIS download were extracted from the zipped files and imported into the ARC/INFO Version 7.2.1 software. The MIDU staff checked the modified soils area coverage, the special features coverages and the NASIS download with the Seamless Re-certification Procedures Version 1.0 developed by the staff at NCGC. The MIDU staff fixed the two pseudonodes that were identified by the AML programs. The re-certified data were electronically transferred to NCGC for archival and distribution. withheld 2003 The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp. withheld 20040112 The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change. withheld 20040112 The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp. withheld 20040303 The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change. withheld 20040303 The tabular data were extracted from the data mart without change. The spatial data's coordinate system was transformed to UTM Zone 18, Northern Hemisphere (NAD 83) using ESRI ArcObjects 8.3 "ConvertFeatureClass" and exported to an ESRI shapefile. withheld 20040925 Metadata imported. withheld 20060331 09052600 Vector Simple FALSE 0 FALSE FALSE coordinate pair survey feet 0.000512 0.000512 North American Datum of 1983 Geodetic Reference System 80 6378137.000000 298.257222 GCS_North_American_1983 NAD_1983_StatePlane_Pennsylvania_South_FIPS_3702_Feet PrimeAgSoils_Class_1_2 Special Soil Features represent soil, nonsoil, or landform features that are too small to be digitized as soil delineations (area features). U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1993. Soil Survey Manual. Soil Surv. Staff, U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 18. Feature Class 0 FID FID OID 4 0 0 Internal feature number. Esri Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated. Shape Shape Geometry 0 0 0 Feature geometry. ESRI Coordinates defining the features. musym musym String 6 0 0 Class Class Integer 5 5 0 F_AREA F_AREA Double 19 0 0 Relative_V Relative_V Integer 10 10 0 Total_V Total_V Double 19 0 0 Shape_Leng Shape_Leng Double 19 0 0 Shape_Area Shape_Area Double 19 0 0 Area of feature in internal units squared. Esri Positive real numbers that are automatically generated. Map Unit Delineations are closed polygons that may be dominated by a single soil or nonsoil component plus allowable similar or dissimilar soils, or they can be geographic mixtures of groups of soils or soils and nonsoil areas. The map unit symbol uniquely identifies each closed delineation map unit. Each symbol corresponds to a map unit name. The map unit key is used to link to information in the National Soil Information System tables. Map Unit Delineations are described by the National Soil Information System database. This attribute database gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and the properties for each soil. The database contains both estimated and measured data on the physical and chemical soil properties and soil interpretations for engineering, water management, recreation, agronomic, woodland, range, and wildlife uses of the soil. The National Soil Information System database contains static metadata. It documents the data structure and includes such information as what tables, columns, indexes, and relationships are defined as well as a variety of attributes of each of these database objects. Attributes include table and column descriptions and detailed domain information. The National Soil Information System database also contains a distribution metadata. It records the criteria used for selecting map units and components for inclusion in the set of distributed data. Special features are described in the feature table. It includes a feature label, feature name, and feature description for each special and ad hoc feature in the survey area. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1999. Soil Taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Soil Conserv. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 436. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (current issue). Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Soil Surv. Staff, Soil Conserv. Serv. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (current issue). National Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI. Soil Surv. Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1993. Soil Survey Manual. Soil Surv. Staff, U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 18. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center mailing address

P.O. Box 6567

Fort Worth Texas 76115 800 672 5559 817 509 3469 Franklin County, Pennsylvania SSURGO Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, no warranty expressed or implied is made by the Agency regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will warrant the delivery of this product in computer readable format, and will offer appropriate adjustment of credit when the product is determined unreadable by correctly adjusted computer input peripherals, or when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. Request for adjustment of credit must be made within 90 days from the date of this shipment from the ordering site. The U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor any of its agencies are liable for misuse of the data, for damage, for transmission of viruses, or for computer contamination through the distribution of these data sets. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) ArcView shapefile spatial WinZip or equivalent 27.8 24.227 withheld Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message. ARC/INFO coverage spatial WinZip or equivalent 27.8 24.227 withheld Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message. ARC/INFO interchange file spatial WinZip or equivalent 27.8 24.227 withheld Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message. ASCII keys and attributes WinZip or equivalent 13.5 24.227 withheld Select desired survey area at above Internet Web site. An email address is required for receipt of instructions on retrieval via anonymous FTP. Anticipate a delay between submission of request at Web site and receipt of email message. There is currently no direct charge for requesting data or for retrieval via FTP. Visit the above mentioned Internet Web Site, select state or territory, then select individual soil survey area of interest. Spatial line data and locations of special feature symbols are in ESRI ArcGIS (ArcView,ArcInfo) shapefile, coverage and interchange (i.e., export) formats. The National Soil Information System attribute soil data are available in variable length, pipe delimited, ASCII file format. Typically within four hours 20060821 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service REQUIRED: The person responsible for the metadata information. State Soil Scientist mailing address

USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service

Pennsylvania State Office

One Credit Union Place, Suite 340

Harrisburg PA 17110-2993 717-237-2207 ed.white@pa.usda.gov FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata FGDC-STD-001-1998 en local time {E8932968-9F89-4472-9C88-4A4FE9C8F232} 20060331 09052600 FALSE 20230329 16544000 20230329 16544000 PrimeAgSoils_Class_1_2 002 0.000 Projected GCS_North_American_1983 Linear Unit: Meter (1.000000) NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_18N <ProjectedCoordinateSystem xsi:type='typens:ProjectedCoordinateSystem' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' xmlns:typens='http://www.esri.com/schemas/ArcGIS/2.9.0'><WKT>PROJCS[&quot;NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_18N&quot;,GEOGCS[&quot;GCS_North_American_1983&quot;,DATUM[&quot;D_North_American_1983&quot;,SPHEROID[&quot;GRS_1980&quot;,6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM[&quot;Greenwich&quot;,0.0],UNIT[&quot;Degree&quot;,0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION[&quot;Transverse_Mercator&quot;],PARAMETER[&quot;False_Easting&quot;,500000.0],PARAMETER[&quot;False_Northing&quot;,0.0],PARAMETER[&quot;Central_Meridian&quot;,-75.0],PARAMETER[&quot;Scale_Factor&quot;,0.9996],PARAMETER[&quot;Latitude_Of_Origin&quot;,0.0],UNIT[&quot;Meter&quot;,1.0],AUTHORITY[&quot;EPSG&quot;,26918]]</WKT><XOrigin>-5120900</XOrigin><YOrigin>-9998100</YOrigin><XYScale>450445547.3910538</XYScale><ZOrigin>-100000</ZOrigin><ZScale>10000</ZScale><MOrigin>-100000</MOrigin><MScale>10000</MScale><XYTolerance>0.001</XYTolerance><ZTolerance>0.001</ZTolerance><MTolerance>0.001</MTolerance><HighPrecision>true</HighPrecision><WKID>26918</WKID><LatestWKID>26918</LatestWKID></ProjectedCoordinateSystem> Esri ArcGIS 12.9.0.32739 PrimeAgSoils_Class_1_2 234394.052998 290469.518832 4463339.537758 4399563.941555 1 -85.195026 -84.933137 51.318215 51.134857 1 This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely sensed and other information. This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory of soils and nonsoil areas that normally occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the National Soil Information System relational database, which gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties. SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Prime Agricultural SoilsClass 1 & 2 soilsPrime FarmlandComprehensive Plan ISO 19115 Geographic Information - Metadata DIS_ESRI1.0 dataset 002 withheld Local Area Network 24.227 Shapefile Shapefile 0.000 NAD_1983_StatePlane_Pennsylvania_South_FIPS_3702_Feet EPSG 6.11(3.0.1) 0 20230329